Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/ase-camera-ready
Use when preparing the ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) camera-ready after acceptance or a successful revision, covering systematic de-anonymization, the extra content page, the mandatory Data Availability finalization, the correct IEEE/ACM template and metadata, permanentized artifact links, and dual IEEE-Xplore/ACM-DL production checks.
Passed 23 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 16 of 23 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
7 fixed16 passed either way0 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
If our paper earned an artifact badge during evaluation, where should the badge appear and what DOI should be linked to it?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Specifies displaying the artifact badge on the front page of the paper. | Passed | Passed |
| Requires matching the artifact badge DOI with the Data Availability Statement DOI. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Deliver the final version after an Accept or a met Revision. ASE camera-ready has three jobs that trip authors up: de-anonymize systematically, spend the extra content page well, and pass dual production checks — because the paper is indexed in both IEEE Xplore and the ACM Digital Library, the metadata and template must satisfy the sponsoring publisher's pipeline. Every requirement below is a one-cycle snapshot; reopen the current camera-ready instructions first.
Reverse every anonymization introduced for double-anonymous review — and only those:
[Authors] real names, affiliations, ORCID, and corresponding-author info restored.
[Tool] real tool name restored consistently throughout (it was anonymized at submission).
[Repository] Data Availability link points to the real, permanent archive (not the anon service).
[Self-cites] third-person self-citations relaxed to normal form where appropriate.
[Acks] funding, grants, and collaborators added (absent from the anonymized submission).
[Metadata] PDF author/producer fields set correctly; no residual "Anonymous".
Do a final pdfinfo / pdftotext pass to confirm no leftover "Anonymous" and no new leak (a
funding line that should not be there, a wrong affiliation).
Accepted ASE papers are typically allowed one additional content page for revisions. Use it to incorporate review feedback — the new baseline, the requested ablation, the clarified construct, the strengthened threats — not to pad. If you received a Revision, the extra page is where the criteria you met become visible in the final paper.
test cases passed, vs 16 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.