Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Use when preparing the ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) camera-ready after acceptance or a successful revision, covering systematic de-anonymization, the extra content page, the mandatory Data Availability finalization, the correct IEEE/ACM template and metadata, permanentized artifact links, and dual IEEE-Xplore/ACM-DL production checks.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -24% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -16% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 15% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 30% | 0% |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -27% | 0% |
Deliver the final version after an Accept or a met Revision. ASE camera-ready has three jobs that trip authors up: de-anonymize systematically, spend the extra content page well, and pass dual production checks — because the paper is indexed in both IEEE Xplore and the ACM Digital Library, the metadata and template must satisfy the sponsoring publisher's pipeline. Every requirement below is a one-cycle snapshot; reopen the current camera-ready instructions first.
Reverse every anonymization introduced for double-anonymous review — and only those:
text[Authors] real names, affiliations, ORCID, and corresponding-author info restored. [Tool] real tool name restored consistently throughout (it was anonymized at submission). [Repository] Data Availability link points to the real, permanent archive (not the anon service). [Self-cites] third-person self-citations relaxed to normal form where appropriate. [Acks] funding, grants, and collaborators added (absent from the anonymized submission). [Metadata] PDF author/producer fields set correctly; no residual "Anonymous".
Do a final pdfinfo / pdftotext pass to confirm no leftover "Anonymous" and no new leak (a funding line that should not be there, a wrong affiliation).
Accepted ASE papers are typically allowed one additional content page for revisions. Use it to incorporate review feedback — the new baseline, the requested ablation, the clarified construct, the strengthened threats — not to pad. If you received a Revision, the extra page is where the criteria you met become visible in the final paper.
Heritage before submitting camera-ready if you have not already.
acmart (switch out thereview/anonymous options for the final class options the instructions specify). Because ASE is dual IEEE/ACM sponsored, the required template and the rights/metadata step can differ per edition; confirm which publisher's pipeline this edition uses and follow that kit.
the paper.
feeds both IEEE Xplore and the ACM DL records; mismatches cause production delays.
(e.g., an IEEE PDF eXpress-style or ACM validation step, per the edition's instructions).
proceedings surfaces (see ase-artifact-evaluation).
text[De-anon] authors/affiliations/tool/repo/acks restored; no leftover "Anonymous"; no new leak [Extra page] review feedback incorporated (not padding); met revision criteria visible [Data Avail] permanent DOI archive, resolves, after Conclusions, within budget [Template] correct edition template/class options; rights block pasted [Metadata] title/authors/abstract/keywords/CCS accurate for IEEE Xplore + ACM DL [Production] fonts embedded; figures render; passes the publisher's PDF checker [Badge] artifact badge reflected if earned; DOI matches Data Availability
text[Camera-ready status] ready / blocked [De-anonymization] complete? residual "Anonymous" or new leak? [Extra page] feedback incorporated / revision criteria visible? [Data Availability] permanent DOI resolves, within budget? [Template + rights] correct template, rights block, accurate metadata for both proceedings? [Fix queue] <ordered, before the camera-ready deadline>
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.