Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/ase-workflow
Use when planning an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research-track campaign backward from the deadline, through abstract registration, the double-anonymous submission, the early-rejection gate, rebuttal, the criteria-bound revision round, artifact evaluation, and the camera-ready in both IEEE Xplore and the ACM Digital Library.
Passed 18 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 8 of 23 without it.
and 15 more in the full report
11 fixed7 passed either way4 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 11 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I am preparing a research paper submission for the Automated Software Engineering conference. Could you help me construct an end-to-end conference execution plan? Please format the output to show the target cycle details (submission, notification, and conference dates), the chosen track, a sequence of preparatory milestones with assignees leading up to the deadline, a gate readiness audit covering abstract status, template, page limits, and data statements, followed by a post-submission plan covering desk rejection risks, rebuttals, revision readiness, and artifact evaluation.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Includes the section heading [Target cycle] | Missed | Passed |
| Specifies the ACM acmart sigconf template for 2026 | Missed | Passed |
| Includes the T-16 week milestone for venue routing | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Run the ASE year backward from the deadline. ASE is an annual conference (dual IEEE/ACM sponsored)
whose research track has an early-rejection gate, a rebuttal, and a first-class,
criteria-bound Revision outcome; plan for all three. Every date below is a one-cycle snapshot —
reopen the current Important Dates page first (see resources/official-source-map.md).
T-16 wk Route with ase-topic-selection: ASE research vs. NIER/Tools vs. FSE/ISSTA/journal.
T-14 wk Lock the automation and the subject systems; freeze what the tool does and what it runs on.
T-10 wk Build evidence (ase-experiments): real subjects, fair tool baselines, ablation isolating
any learned component. Pin provenance now (ase-reproducibility) — it cannot be retrofitted.
T-6 wk Draft to the ASE arc (ase-writing-style) against the worked example; write related work
delta-first (ase-related-work). Keep to 10 content pages + 2 reference pages.
T-3 wk Assemble the anonymized artifact and the mandatory Data Availability Statement.
T-1 wk Register the abstract before its (earlier) deadline. Double-anonymous sweep (ase-submission)
on tool names, repos, PDF metadata.
T-0 Submit on ase26.hotcrp.com in the mandated template (ACM acmart sigconf for 2026).
[Reviews + early-rejection gate] uniformly negative scores -> early reject, no rebuttal.
[Rebuttal] if you reach it, at least one reviewer saw value; move the
borderline reviewer with facts and small checkable numbers.
[Outcome] Accept / Revision / Reject.
[Revision round] meet every stated criterion; return the revised paper + a
point-by-point summary-of-changes, re-checked against the criteria.
test cases passed, vs 8 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.