Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/asplos-camera-ready
Use when converting an ASPLOS acceptance or Major Revision decision into a publishable ACM paper within the six-week window — de-anonymization, ACM rights and template obligations, the revision change note, artifact-appendix integration and badge placement, and Digital Library metadata checks.
Passed 22 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 16 of 23 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
6 fixed16 passed either way1 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Which administrative aspects of ASPLOS 2027 camera-ready preparation are explicitly noted as needing verification with the acceptance email instructions rather than assumed from previous years?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Lists attendance rules and page allowances as items needing verification. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
The camera-ready deadline at ASPLOS 2027 sits roughly six weeks after notification — verified indirectly, via the CFP's statement that Major Revisions are resubmitted "at the camera ready deadline (6 weeks from notification)" (checked 2026-07-08; the exact date and page allowance for camera-ready are 待核实 and arrive with the acceptance email). The window is shared by two very different tasks, so the first step is knowing which track you are on.
| Track | What is due | Judged by |
|---|---|---|
| Accepted paper | Final, de-anonymized, ACM-formatted PDF + forms | Publication staff + shepherd if assigned (shepherding for 2027: 待核实) |
| Major Revision | The revised submission — still a reviewed document | The program committee, as a submission on record |
Do not apply camera-ready instincts to a Major Revision: it stays within submission rules (anonymity unless told otherwise — confirm in the decision letter), and its companion document is a change note keyed to the decision letter, item by item, with pointers to where each required change landed. If this revision follows an earlier revision, the note describes deltas relative to the previous revision, per the CFP's revision-counts-as-submission rule.
Reversing double-blind is not just adding an author block. Work from the submission-time anonymity sweep, inverting each entry:
# residue sweep on the final PDF
pdftotext final.pdf - | grep -niE 'anonym|blind|supplemental material \[|placeholder' | head
test cases passed, vs 16 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.