Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Use when converting an ASPLOS acceptance or Major Revision decision into a publishable ACM paper within the six-week window — de-anonymization, ACM rights and template obligations, the revision change note, artifact-appendix integration and badge placement, and Digital Library metadata checks.
.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-asplos-camera-ready/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -4% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 48% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 61% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 99% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 107% | 0% |
The camera-ready deadline at ASPLOS 2027 sits roughly six weeks after notification — verified indirectly, via the CFP's statement that Major Revisions are resubmitted "at the camera ready deadline (6 weeks from notification)" (checked 2026-07-08; the exact date and page allowance for camera-ready are 待核实 and arrive with the acceptance email). The window is shared by two very different tasks, so the first step is knowing which track you are on.
| Track | What is due | Judged by | |---|---|---| | Accepted paper | Final, de-anonymized, ACM-formatted PDF + forms | Publication staff + shepherd if assigned (shepherding for 2027: 待核实) | | Major Revision | The revised submission — still a reviewed document | The program committee, as a submission on record |
Do not apply camera-ready instincts to a Major Revision: it stays within submission rules (anonymity unless told otherwise — confirm in the decision letter), and its companion document is a change note keyed to the decision letter, item by item, with pointers to where each required change landed. If this revision follows an earlier revision, the note describes deltas relative to the previous revision, per the CFP's revision-counts-as-submission rule.
Reversing double-blind is not just adding an author block. Work from the submission-time anonymity sweep, inverting each entry:
better — and check none of them still says "the authors of 12]" about yourself.
per ACM policy (immediately before References when in Acknowledgments).
where confidentiality allows.
bash# residue sweep on the final PDF pdftotext final.pdf - | grep -niE 'anonym|blind|supplemental material \[|placeholder' | head pdfinfo final.pdf | grep -iE 'author|creator' # metadata now SHOULD name you
generated rights text must be pasted into the paper before the final build, and DOI/ISBN metadata follows from it.
and the submission system — mismatches stall Digital Library ingestion and corrupt citation records for years.
the multi-cycle model; your cycle determines your volume. Production workflow details (TAPS or classic, camera-ready page allowance) for 2027: 待核实 with the acceptance instructions.
Camera-ready is when artifact evaluation converges with the paper (asplos-artifact-evaluation):
its dependency list is a promise readers will act on.
authors or ACM; confirm placement follows the 2027 instructions rather than copying a previous year's badge layout.
claims it; a dead artifact link in the DL is permanent embarrassment.
deadline into a checklist; identify track (accept vs revision).
sync. For revisions: the required experiments, and nothing speculative.
archive the tagged source.
Presentation and registration obligations for 2027 (who must attend Heraklion, April 11-15, 2027; fees; remote options) were 待核实 at pack-check time — read the acceptance email's requirements before booking or skipping travel.
Run on the exact PDF going to production, not the working draft:
(the DL's print-view and many readers' printers are unforgiving).
permanent, unlike in a submission.
additions (new "since submission" citations arrive malformed by default).
supplemental material") to their published targets.
co-authors expect to see indexed — this is the last moment ordering disputes can be resolved quietly.
authors ordered, badges displayed, artifact link resolving. Ingestion errors fixed early are emails; fixed late they are erratum processes.
and route post-publication fixes to a new tagged version rather than mutating the evaluated one — the badge attaches to what the committee evaluated.
multi-volume-per-edition publishing makes later citation reconstruction error-prone without it.
text[Track] accepted-final / major-revision [Letter checklist] items: N · addressed: N · pointers recorded: Y/N [De-anonymization] diff complete · residue sweep clean: Y/N [ACM forms] rights done · title/author exact-match verified: Y/N [Artifact] deposit public + DOI minted · appendix synced · badges per instructions [待核实] camera-ready date / page allowance / shepherding / attendance rules
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.