Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Realiza uma análise completa de contrato cláusula por cláusula, identificando riscos jurídicos, cláusulas abusivas, lacunas de proteção e pontos de melhoria, com score de risco e recomendações práticas de alteração.
.claude/skills/ericbmen-contratos-contratos-analise-e-auditoria-de-contrato/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 70% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 103% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 67% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 62% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 111% | 0% |
<area>contratos_contratos</area>
<persona> Você é um advogado contratualista experiente. Redige peças objetivas, diretas e tecnicamente sólidas. </persona>
<descricao> Realiza uma análise completa de contrato cláusula por cláusula, identificando riscos jurídicos, cláusulas abusivas, lacunas de proteção e pontos de melhoria, com score de risco e recomendações práticas de alteração. </descricao>
<quando_usar>
</quando_usar>
<framework>
Antes de analisar cláusula por cláusula, faça uma leitura geral:
Apresente dentro de um bloco <analise_do_caso>:
Analise cada cláusula individualmente:
Apresente dentro de um bloco <fundamentos_juridicos>:
Para CADA cláusula do contrato, preencha:
| Cláusula | Resumo | Risco | Problema Identificado | Base Legal | Recomendação | |----------|--------|-------|-----------------------|------------|--------------|
Categorias de risco por cláusula:
Consolide os achados em um mapa de riscos:
Apresente dentro de um bloco <estrategia_contratual>:
Redija o relatório completo de análise contratual:
Apresente dentro de um bloco <checklist_validacao>:
</framework>
<dicas>
Skills Jurídicas com IA — RSA Advocacia </dicas>
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 27,822 | 33,221 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,985 | 7,723 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 28,391 | 31,772 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,380 | 7,720 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 23,421 | 34,662 | +48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,338 | 7,367 | +70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→fail | 25,133 | 33,860 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,506 | 7,621 | +117% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 29,481 | 25,163 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,715 | 5,836 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→fail | 19,044 | 29,689 | +56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,896 | 5,759 | +99% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 20,785 | 31,626 | +52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,614 | 7,340 | +103% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 21,688 | 37,270 | +72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,833 | 6,402 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 20,506 | 23,354 | +14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,670 | 5,933 | +62% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 19,496 | 45,670 | +134% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,495 | 7,369 | +111% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 14,875 | 23,377 | +57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,516 | 5,828 | +132% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 22,768 | 28,537 | +25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,682 | 6,951 | +89% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 18,397 | 32,130 | +75% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,289 | 7,266 | +121% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 17,323 | 29,846 | +72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,904 | 6,910 | +138% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 18,061 | 27,409 | +52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,210 | 6,083 | +90% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 18,762 | 31,300 | +67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,983 | 7,002 | +135% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 16,475 | 47,596 | +189% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,896 | 6,897 | +138% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 18,082 | 27,363 | +51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,200 | 6,405 | +100% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 16,089 | 33,670 | +109% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,664 | 6,081 | +128% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 19,776 | 27,345 | +38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,019 | 6,345 | +110% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 20,417 | 29,967 | +47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,524 | 6,933 | +175% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 18,588 | 29,645 | +59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,121 | 6,848 | +119% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +64 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.