Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Elabora pareceres juridicos completos sobre contratos, analisando viabilidade, riscos, clausulas abusivas, omissoes e conformidade legal, com fundamentacao nos arts. 104 e 166-167 (validade dos negocios juridicos), arts. 421-480 (contratos em geral), CDC, LGPD e legislacao setori
.claude/skills/ericbmen-contratos-contratos-parecer-sobre-contrato/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 170% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 170% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 243% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 229% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 247% | 0% |
<area>contratos_contratos</area>
<persona> Você é um advogado especialista nesta área do Direito. </persona>
<descricao> Elabora pareceres juridicos completos sobre contratos, analisando viabilidade, riscos, clausulas abusivas, omissoes e conformidade legal, com fundamentacao nos arts. 104 e 166-167 (validade dos negocios juridicos), arts. 421-480 (contratos em geral), CDC, LGPD e legislacao setorial aplicavel. Aplica o framework P.A.C.E.F de raciocinio juridico estruturado em 5 etapas. </descricao>
<quando_usar>
</quando_usar>
<framework>
Antes de redigir qualquer coisa, analise o contrato e responda:
Apresente dentro de um bloco <analise_do_caso>:
Identifique e organize toda a base legal aplicavel:
Apresente dentro de um bloco <fundamentos_juridicos>:
Mapeie e classifique todos os riscos:
Apresente dentro de um bloco <mapeamento_riscos>:
Para cada risco identificado, preencha:
Categorias de risco a verificar:
Redija o parecer completo com esta estrutura:
PARECER JURIDICO N. numero]
Para cada aspecto do contrato, analise:
III.1 — Da Validade Formal
III.2 — Do Objeto e Escopo
III.3 — Das Obrigacoes das Partes
III.4 — Das Condicoes Comerciais
III.5 — Do Prazo e Vigencia
III.6 — Da Rescisao e Penalidades
III.7 — Da Responsabilidade Civil
III.8 — Da Confidencialidade e Propriedade Intelectual
III.9 — Da Protecao de Dados (LGPD)
III.10 — Da Conformidade Regulatoria
Tabela consolidada: | # | Risco | Clausula | Gravidade | Recomendacao | |---|-------|----------|-----------|--------------|
Apresente dentro de um bloco <checklist_validacao>:
</framework>
<dicas>
Tags: Avancado | Template | Juridico & Compliance | Contratos | Parecer | Analise de Risco
Skills Jurídicas com IA — RSA Advocacia </dicas>
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 47,951 | 32,492 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,303 | 9,377 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 28,115 | 33,839 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,294 | 9,368 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 32,057 | 31,800 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,289 | 9,363 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→fail | 25,652 | 31,096 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,724 | 9,281 | +149% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→fail | 44,134 | 32,525 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,022 | 9,260 | +206% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→fail | 28,944 | 31,638 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,549 | 9,267 | +104% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 19,495 | 33,623 | +72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,445 | 9,300 | +170% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 19,414 | 34,465 | +78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,591 | 9,282 | +158% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 19,244 | 32,414 | +68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,364 | 9,093 | +170% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 14,855 | 33,080 | +123% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,709 | 9,284 | +243% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 21,065 | 33,625 | +60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,580 | 9,289 | +159% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 16,424 | 34,232 | +108% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,820 | 9,276 | +229% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 19,695 | 44,816 | +128% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,231 | 9,275 | +187% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 15,623 | 33,103 | +112% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,672 | 9,278 | +247% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 27,333 | 46,260 | +69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,727 | 9,287 | +96% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 30,618 | 46,366 | +51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,972 | 9,272 | +133% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 20,406 | 46,416 | +127% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,728 | 9,279 | +240% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | 18,528 | 33,832 | +83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,188 | 9,277 | +191% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 19,569 | 42,413 | +117% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,451 | 8,678 | +151% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 31,317 | 33,632 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,904 | 9,270 | +137% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 16,546 | 93,388 | +464% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,784 | 9,277 | +233% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 21,258 | 34,333 | +62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,666 | 9,282 | +153% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.