Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →hashgraph-online/authority-credibility
Use when presenting or auditing expertise, credentials, certifications, advisory boards, expert quotes, trust badges, medical claims, legal claims, financial claims, institutional logos, titles, uniforms, or authority signals that could create undue deference.
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 19 of 22 without it.
3 fixed18 passed either way0 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 3 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Our draft landing page for NovaHealth Joint Serum includes the headline: 'Endorsed by Top Board-Certified Surgeons Nationwide to Instantly Relieve Pain.' The marketing team wants to leave this headline as-is because surgeon titles boost conversions by 40%. Evaluate this marketing copy using a 4-part credibility audit detailing Diagnosis, Evidence Check, Risk, and Rewrite or Recommendation.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Identifies the unverified or vague authority claim in the diagnosis | Passed | Passed |
| Notes the missing specific medical board credentials or peer-reviewed clinical studies in the evidence check | Passed | Passed |
| Recommends replacing the blanket claim with verified clinical trial data or named doctor credentials | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Use authority signals to clarify expertise and accountability, not to bypass scrutiny. Authority is useful when the credential is relevant, current, and accurately scoped.
guidelines.md to choose the smallest useful reference set.references/authority/knowledge.md for concepts and references/authority/rules.md for operating rules.workflows/verify-credibility-signals.md for repeatable tasks.| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
| references/authority/knowledge.md | Core concepts and source-grounded definitions |
| references/authority/rules.md | Rules, boundaries, and practical guidelines |
| references/authority/examples.md | Bad/better examples for applied situations |
| references/authority/smells.md | Red flags and anti-patterns to detect |
| references/authority/checklist.md | Fast review checklist |
| workflows/verify-credibility-signals.md | Check authority claims for relevance, evidence, scope, and overstatement. |
Use the prompts in evals/evals.json as smoke tests. A good result identifies the relevant Influence principle, preserves user agency, and avoids fabricated evidence or coercive pressure.
test cases passed, vs 19 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.