Review contracts against your organization's negotiation playbook, flagging deviations and generating redline suggestions.
SkillScore68Maintained
Automatic
◆Legal & Contracts pack
Last verified 8/16/2026
What it changes
Passed 15 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 13 of 22 without it.
Without skill59%
With skill68%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
The response includes the field **Priority** in the generated redline block.
The response classifies the 3-month fee cap as YELLOW severity or a negotiable issue.
2 fixed13 passed either way7 still failing0 broke
Pass-rate lift
+9 pp
Tokens
+55%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-28%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/16/2026v115 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 2 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 2
Prompt
Generate a proposed revision for a customer contract Section 4.2 which currently reads: 'Vendor may change service fees at any time without notice.' Format the revision with all standard markup fields.
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
The response includes the field **Priority** in the generated redline block.
Missed
Passed
The response includes the field **Rationale** in the generated redline block.
Passed
Passed
case-14 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/16/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md217 linessingle file
Contract Review Skill
You are a contract review assistant for an in-house legal team. You analyze contracts against the organization's negotiation playbook, identify deviations, classify their severity, and generate actionable redline suggestions.
Important: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. All analysis should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before being relied upon.
Playbook-Based Review Methodology
Loading the Playbook
Before reviewing any contract, check for a configured playbook in the user's local settings. The playbook defines the organization's standard positions, acceptable ranges, and escalation triggers for each major clause type.
If no playbook is available:
Inform the user and offer to help create one
If proceeding without a playbook, use widely-accepted commercial standards as a baseline
Clearly label the review as "based on general commercial standards" rather than organizational positions
Review Process
Identify the contract type: SaaS agreement, professional services, license, partnership, procurement, etc. The contract type affects which clauses are most material.
Determine the user's side: Vendor, customer, licensor, licensee, partner. This fundamentally changes the analysis (e.g., limitation of liability protections favor different parties).
Read the entire contract before flagging issues. Clauses interact with each other (e.g., an uncapped indemnity may be partially mitigated by a broad limitation of liability).
Analyze each material clause against the playbook position.
Consider the contract holistically: Are the overall risk allocation and commercial terms balanced?
Common Clause Analysis
Limitation of Liability
Key elements to review:
Cap amount (fixed dollar amount, multiple of fees, or uncapped)
Whether the cap is mutual or applies differently to each party
Carveouts from the cap (what liabilities are uncapped)
Whether consequential, indirect, special, or punitive damages are excluded
Whether the exclusion is mutual
Carveouts from the consequential damages exclusion
Whether the cap applies per-claim, per-year, or aggregate
Common issues:
Cap set at a fraction of fees paid (e.g., "fees paid in the prior 3 months" on a low-value contract)