Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lawve-ai/decision-ownership-audit-ignacio-adrian-lerer
Audits AI-assisted legal, compliance, governance, and institutional decisions before reliance to determine whether the responsible human or institution has enough access to the evidence, reasoning basis, uncertainty, authority, and review path to genuinely own the decision rather than merely approve, sign, or transmit it.
Passed 15 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 7 of 22 without it.
and 9 more in the full report
10 fixed4 passed either way6 still failing2 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 10 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
A international bank uses an automated screening system to freeze wire transfers matching OFAC sanctions lists. A named sanctions compliance officer oversees the workflow and can review the raw passport match scores, underlying target entry details, and false-positive history before confirming any account freeze. Audit decision ownership for this workflow.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Assigns a verdict of PASS. | Missed | Passed |
| Notes that the compliance officer has full access to evidence, underlying match scores, and correction tools. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
This skill audits whether a person or institution can responsibly rely on an AI-assisted legal or governance output before approving, signing, filing, sending, enforcing, or otherwise acting on it.
It does not ask only whether the output is correct, plausible, well written, or formally reviewed. It asks whether the responsible actor has enough access to the basis of the decision to stand behind it as a professional or institutional judgment.
Use it for legal memos, litigation strategy, contract review, compliance decisions, regulatory responses, board materials, risk approvals, due diligence conclusions, policy determinations, and other outputs that may move from analysis into reliance.
Can the responsible human or institution genuinely own this decision, or are they merely ratifying an output whose basis they cannot inspect, contest, or correct?
Identify who is expected to own the decision.
Classify the actor as:
If no responsible actor is identifiable, the output is not ready for reliance.
State what the actor is being asked to do with the output:
test cases passed, vs 7 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.