Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lawve-ai/eac-habre-jeanne-sulzer
Méthodologie « verification-first » pour les Chambres Africaines Extraordinaires (procès Hissène Habré, Dakar). Toute citation est vérifiée (forumchambresafricaines.org, legal-tools.org). Couvre le jugement du 30 mai 2016, l'arrêt d'appel du 27 avril 2017 (réparations de 82,290 milliards FCFA pour 7 396 victimes), et la compétence universelle. Aide à la recherche, pas un conseil juridique. Fait partie de la bibliothèque open source « Skills for International Justice » — méthodologie : github.com
Passed 23 of 25 test cases with the skill, and 13 of 25 without it.
and 12 more in the full report
10 fixed13 passed either way2 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 10 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
A paralegal draft refers to the EAC pre-trial indictment organ as the 'Chambre d'accusation extraordinaire'. Correct the chamber designation and state the date of the formal indictment against Hissène Habré.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Corrects the pre-trial chamber title to Chambre Africaine Extraordinaire d'Instruction. | Missed | Passed |
| States the formal indictment date as 13 February 2015. | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
This skill governs every output that touches the Chambres Africaines Extraordinaires au sein des juridictions sénégalaises (CAE) — known in English as the Extraordinary African Chambers in the Courts of Senegal (EAC). The discipline is simple and the reason for it is concrete: the EAC tried one person — Hissène Habré, former President of the Republic of Chad — and produced a foundational moment in international criminal justice: the first prosecution of an African former Head of State by African institutions for international crimes, and the first prosecution under universal jurisdiction in Africa to proceed to trial. Habré's death on 24 August 2021 closed the criminal phase; the reparations phase, transferred to the African Union Trust Fund for Victims, remains substantively open.
For any case-specific document — judgment, decision, indictment, filing, civil party submission — verify before citing. "Verify" means web_fetch (or equivalent retrieval) to the EAC archives (the historical domain chambresafricaines.org is intermittently unavailable; the mirror forumchambresafricaines.org and the ICC Legal Tools Database remain reliable Tier 1 sources) in the current conversation. Foundational texts in project knowledge (Accord UA-Sénégal 2012, Statut des CAE) are the exception; they may be cited directly. Nothing else.
The EAC's documentary corpus is finite and well-mapped — only one accused, four key decisions, a defined civil party register. Three levels:
Label the level where relevant. The EAC decisions are voluminous (the Trial Judgment of 30 May 2016 exceeds 600 pages); use page references where paragraph numbers are not authoritative.
Step 0 — Identify the document. Before anything else, distinguish:
Step 1 — Plan citations. List every citation that will appear and the proposition each supports. Distinguish criminal and civil dispositions.
Step 2 — Verify with the fallback ladder. EAC archive (forumchambresafricaines.org) → legal-tools.org → African Union legal portal (au.int) → HRW Habré case page (Tier 1 for procedural milestones given Reed Brody's central documentary role) → academic commentary (Tier 2) → ask the user.
Step 3 — Draft using verified material. Use the citation format in references/citation-format.md. Where verification is partial, say so.
Step 4 — Self-audit. Each citation must trace to project knowledge or to a successful retrieval in this conversation.
test cases passed, vs 13 / 25 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.