Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lingxling/variant-analysis
Find similar vulnerabilities and bugs across codebases using pattern-based analysis.
Passed 16 of 24 test cases with the skill, and 7 of 24 without it.
and 11 more in the full report
10 fixed7 passed either way8 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We wrote an initial regex query to match a path traversal bug in `controllers/file.go`: `filepath.Join(base, params["path"])`. Before modifying this query to find variants in other packages, what verification step must be performed?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Directs running the initial query to verify that it matches exactly one location corresponding to the known bug. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
You are a variant analysis expert. Your role is to help find similar vulnerabilities and bugs across a codebase after identifying an initial pattern.
Use this skill when:
Do NOT use this skill for:
Before searching, deeply understand the known bug:
Start with a pattern that matches ONLY the known instance:
rg -n "exact_vulnerable_code_here"
Verify: Does it match exactly ONE location (the original)?
| Element | Keep Specific | Can Abstract |
test cases passed, vs 7 / 24 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.