Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →When the user wants to create sales collateral, pitch decks, one-pagers, objection handling docs, or demo scripts. Also use when the user mentions 'sales deck,' 'pitch deck,' 'one-pager,' 'leave-behind,' 'objection handling,' 'deal-specific ROI analysis,' 'demo script,' 'talk track,' 'sales playbook,' 'proposal template,' 'buyer persona card,' 'help my sales team,' 'sales materials,' or 'what should I give my sales reps.' Use this for any document or asset that helps a sales team close deals. Fo
.claude/skills/mkurman-sales-enablement/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 178% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 103% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 113% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 123% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 189% | 0% |
| Buyer | Emphasize | De-emphasize | |-------|-----------|--------------| | Technical buyer | Architecture, security, integrations, API | ROI calculations, business metrics | | Economic buyer | ROI, payback period, total cost, risk | Technical details, implementation specifics | | Champion | Internal selling points, quick wins, peer proof | Deep technical or financial detail |
For full slide-by-slide guidance: See references/deck-frameworks.md
For templates by use case: See references/one-pager-templates.md
| Category | Examples | |----------|----------| | Price | "Too expensive," "No budget this quarter," "Competitor is cheaper" | | Timing | "Not the right time," "Maybe next quarter," "Too busy to implement" | | Competition | "We already use X," "What makes you different?" | | Authority | "I need to check with my boss," "The committee decides" | | Status quo | "What we have works fine," "Not broken, don't fix it" | | Technical | "Does it integrate with X?," "Security concerns," "Can it scale?" |
For each objection, document:
For the full objection library: See references/objection-library.md
Inputs (current state metrics the prospect provides):
Calculations (your formula for value):
Outputs (what the prospect sees):
| Persona | Cares About | Lead With | |---------|-------------|-----------| | CTO / VP Eng | Architecture, scale, security, team velocity | Technical superiority, integration depth | | VP Sales | Pipeline, quota attainment, rep productivity | Revenue impact, time savings per rep | | CFO | Total cost, payback period, risk | ROI, cost reduction, financial predictability | | End user | Ease of use, daily workflow, learning curve | Time saved, frustration eliminated |
| Type | Duration | Focus | |------|----------|-------| | Discovery call | 30 min | Qualify, understand pain, map buying process | | First demo | 30-45 min | Show 3-4 workflows tied to their pain | | Technical deep-dive | 45-60 min | Architecture, security, integrations, API | | Executive overview | 20-30 min | Business outcomes, ROI, strategic alignment |
For full script templates: See references/demo-scripts.md
Marketing case studies tell a story. Sales case studies arm reps with fast-access proof. Keep them short, outcome-focused, and tagged for retrieval.
Organize case studies so reps can find the right one instantly:
Playbooks die when they're not updated. Review quarterly, get input from top reps, and remove anything outdated. Assign an owner — if nobody owns it, it rots.
| Field | Description | |-------|-------------| | Role / title | Common titles and reporting structure | | Goals | What success looks like for them | | Pains | What frustrates them daily | | Top objections | The 3-5 objections you'll hear from this role | | Evaluation criteria | How they judge solutions | | Buying process | Their role in the decision, who they influence | | Messaging angle | The one sentence that resonates most |
Deliver the right format for each asset type:
| Asset | Deliverable | |-------|-------------| | Sales deck | Slide-by-slide outline with headline, body copy, and speaker notes | | One-pager | Full copy with layout guidance (visual hierarchy, sections) | | Objection doc | Table format: objection, response, proof point, follow-up | | Demo script | Scene-by-scene with timing, talk track, and interaction points | | ROI calculator | Input fields, formulas, output display with sample data | | Playbook | Structured document with table of contents and sections | | Persona card | One-page card format per persona | | Proposal | Section-by-section copy with customization notes |
If context is missing, ask:
For partner sales enablement, see the tools registry:
| Tool | What It Does | Guide | |------|-------------|-------| | Introw | Partner engagement tracking, deal registration, mutual action plans | introw.md |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 26,623 | 31,404 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,999 | 7,709 | +93% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 16,510 | 17,475 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,454 | 5,619 | +129% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 12,606 | 15,579 | +24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,884 | 5,235 | +178% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 28,259 | 32,085 | +14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,445 | 7,719 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 16,067 | 13,735 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,412 | 4,888 | +103% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 11,942 | 7,874 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,829 | 4,120 | +125% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 17,571 | 17,978 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,747 | 5,943 | +116% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 19,751 | 22,209 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,853 | 6,090 | +113% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 13,671 | 12,385 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,132 | 4,703 | +121% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 17,549 | 18,268 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,760 | 5,879 | +113% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 13,632 | 6,905 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,980 | 4,004 | +102% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 11,634 | 7,134 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,764 | 3,933 | +123% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 17,650 | 25,949 | +47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,581 | 6,826 | +164% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 17,680 | 16,527 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,668 | 5,259 | +97% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 9,496 | 5,926 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,427 | 3,693 | +159% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 16,018 | 26,787 | +67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,480 | 7,161 | +189% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 24,128 | 28,650 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,834 | 7,349 | +92% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 7,686 | 2,302 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,148 | 3,245 | +183% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 13,945 | 5,733 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,006 | 3,750 | +87% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 7,764 | 2,172 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,287 | 3,211 | +149% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 14,119 | 12,385 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,130 | 4,773 | +124% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 29,974 | 28,819 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,167 | 9,044 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 19,774 | 17,836 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,920 | 5,427 | +86% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +30 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.