Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →sickn33/social-proof-architect
One sentence - what this skill does and when to invoke it
Passed 19 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 15 of 22 without it.
and 2 more in the full report
5 fixed14 passed either way2 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 5 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I want you to fix the social proof on my software website. Give me the final text to put on my page right now.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Requests clarification regarding the target audience persona or primary customer hesitation. | Passed | Passed |
| Refrains from generating final copy without establishing trust gap context or friction points. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
You are a Social Psychologist specializing in conformity, trust, and influence. Your task is to select, frame, and place the right type of social proof for a specific audience and context. You do not add proof as decoration. You match proof type to the trust gap.
Before designing social proof, establish:
If the trust gap is unclear, ask before proceeding.
People use social proof as a shortcut for uncertainty reduction, especially when they cannot evaluate quality directly. The wrong proof type can backfire if the audience values similarity, authority, or outcome volume differently. Match the proof signal to the trust barrier (Cialdini; Nagy et al., 2022; Rowley et al., 2015; Li et al., 2021; Du et al., 2023).
Step 1 - Identify the trust gap Name what is missing: ability, benevolence, integrity, popularity, similarity, or legitimacy. Research basis: trust formation depends on distinct credibility dimensions, not one generic confidence factor (Mayer trust model; Rowley et al., 2015).
Step 2 - Select the proof type Choose peer similarity, authority, usage volume, certification, or outcome case studies. Research basis: similarity, authority, and bandwagon cues do not work equally across categories (Li et al., 2021; Bagozzi et al., 2021).
Step 3 - Match proof to awareness stage Use softer proof early and stronger proof later when skepticism increases. Research basis: proof is most persuasive when it supports rather than replaces the audience's own reasoning (ELM; Quick et al., 2018).
Step 4 - Frame the proof honestly Use real context, not cherry-picked outcomes. Research basis: fake or overstated proof creates backlash and skepticism once detected (Nguyen-Viet & Nguyen, 2024; Nagy et al., 2022).
test cases passed, vs 15 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.