Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Unified team skill for frontend development. Pure router — all roles read this file. Beat model is coordinator-only in monitor.md. Built-in ui-ux-pro-max design intelligence. Triggers on "team frontend".
.claude/skills/team-frontend/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Unified team skill: frontend development with built-in ui-ux-pro-max design intelligence. Covers requirement analysis, design system generation, frontend implementation, and quality assurance. Built on team-worker agent architecture — all worker roles share a single agent definition with role-specific Phase 2-4 loaded from role.md specs.
Skill(skill="team-frontend", args="task description")
|
SKILL.md (this file) = Router
|
+--------------+--------------+
| |
no --role flag --role <name>
| |
Coordinator Worker
roles/coordinator/role.md roles/<name>/role.md
|
+-- analyze -> dispatch -> spawn workers -> STOP
|
+-------+-------+-------+
v v v v
[analyst] [architect] [developer] [qa]
(team-worker agents, each loads roles/<role>/role.md)| Role | Path | Prefix | Inner Loop | |------|------|--------|------------| | coordinator | roles/coordinator/role.md | — | — | | analyst | roles/analyst/role.md | ANALYZE- | false | | architect | [roles/architect/role.md](roles/architect/role.md) | ARCH- | false | | developer | roles/developer/role.md | DEV- | true | | qa | [roles/qa/role.md](roles/qa/role.md) | QA- | false |
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
--role <name> → Read roles/<name>/role.md, execute Phase 2-4--role → @roles/coordinator/role.md, execute entry routerFE.workflow/.team/FE-<slug>-<date>/ccw cli --mode analysis (read-only), ccw cli --mode write (modifications)mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg(session_id=<session-id>, ...)Coordinator spawns workers using this template:
Agent({
subagent_type: "team-worker",
description: "Spawn <role> worker",
team_name: "frontend",
name: "<role>",
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: frontend
requirement: <task-description>
inner_loop: <true|false>
## Progress Milestones
session_id: <session-id>
Report progress via team_msg at natural phase boundaries (context loaded -> core work done -> verification).
Report blockers immediately via team_msg type="blocker".
Report completion via team_msg type="task_complete" after final SendMessage.
Read role_spec file (@<skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.
Execute built-in Phase 1 (task discovery) -> role Phase 2-4 -> built-in Phase 5 (report).`
})| Command | Action | |---------|--------| | check / status | View execution status graph | | resume / continue | Advance to next step |
.workflow/.team/FE-<slug>-<YYYY-MM-DD>/
├── .msg/
│ ├── messages.jsonl # Message bus log
│ └── meta.json # Session state + cross-role state
├── task-analysis.json # Coordinator analyze output
├── wisdom/ # Cross-task knowledge
├── analysis/ # Analyst output
│ ├── design-intelligence.json
│ └── requirements.md
├── architecture/ # Architect output
│ ├── design-tokens.json
│ ├── component-specs/
│ └── project-structure.md
├── qa/ # QA output
│ └── audit-<NNN>.md
└── build/ # Developer output| Scenario | Resolution | |----------|------------| | Unknown command | Error with available command list | | Role not found | Error with role registry | | QA score < 6 over 2 GC rounds | Escalate to user | | ui-ux-pro-max unavailable | Degrade to LLM general design knowledge | | Worker no response | Report waiting task, suggest user resume | | Pipeline deadlock | Check blockedBy chain, report blocking point |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 5 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +39 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.