Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Batch effect correction for CRISPR screens. Covers normalization across batches, technical replicate handling, and batch-aware analysis. Use when combining screens from multiple batches or correcting systematic technical variation.
.claude/skills/bio-crispr-screens-batch-correction/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Reference examples tested with: DESeq2 1.42+, MAGeCK 0.5+, matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, pandas 2.2+, scikit-learn 1.4+, scipy 1.12+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signaturesIf code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
"Correct batch effects in my CRISPR screens" → Normalize and harmonize sgRNA count data across screen batches to remove systematic technical variation while preserving biological signal.
scipy/sklearn for median normalization and batch correctionmageck test with batch-aware designGoal: Remove systematic library-size differences between batches.
Approach: Scale each sample within a batch so that sample medians match a global median, correcting for sequencing depth variation.
pythonimport numpy as np import pandas as pd from scipy import stats def median_normalize(counts_df, batch_column='batch'): '''Normalize counts to median within each batch.''' normalized = counts_df.copy() guide_columns = [c for c in counts_df.columns if c not in [batch_column, 'gene', 'guide']] for batch in counts_df[batch_column].unique(): batch_mask = counts_df[batch_column] == batch batch_data = counts_df.loc[batch_mask, guide_columns] sample_medians = batch_data.median(axis=0) global_median = sample_medians.median() scale_factors = global_median / sample_medians normalized.loc[batch_mask, guide_columns] = batch_data * scale_factors return normalized counts_df = pd.read_csv('screen_counts.csv') normalized = median_normalize(counts_df, 'batch')
pythondef size_factor_normalize(counts_df, reference='geometric_mean'): '''DESeq2-style size factor normalization.''' guide_cols = [c for c in counts_df.columns if c.startswith('sample_')] counts = counts_df[guide_cols].values counts_nonzero = np.where(counts == 0, np.nan, counts) if reference == 'geometric_mean': log_counts = np.log(counts_nonzero) geometric_mean = np.exp(np.nanmean(log_counts, axis=1)) else: geometric_mean = counts_nonzero.mean(axis=1) ratios = counts_nonzero / geometric_mean[:, np.newaxis] size_factors = np.nanmedian(ratios, axis=0) normalized_counts = counts / size_factors normalized_df = counts_df.copy() normalized_df[guide_cols] = normalized_counts return normalized_df, size_factors normalized, size_factors = size_factor_normalize(counts_df) print('Size factors:', size_factors)
pythondef quantile_normalize(counts_df, guide_cols=None): '''Quantile normalization across samples.''' if guide_cols is None: guide_cols = [c for c in counts_df.columns if c.startswith('sample_')] data = counts_df[guide_cols].values.copy() sorted_data = np.sort(data, axis=0) mean_values = sorted_data.mean(axis=1) ranks = np.argsort(np.argsort(data, axis=0), axis=0) normalized = mean_values[ranks] result = counts_df.copy() result[guide_cols] = normalized return result qn_counts = quantile_normalize(counts_df)
pythondef normalize_to_controls(counts_df, control_genes, method='median'): '''Normalize using non-targeting or negative control guides.''' guide_cols = [c for c in counts_df.columns if c.startswith('sample_')] is_control = counts_df['gene'].isin(control_genes) control_data = counts_df.loc[is_control, guide_cols] if method == 'median': control_values = control_data.median(axis=0) elif method == 'mean': control_values = control_data.mean(axis=0) elif method == 'sum': control_values = control_data.sum(axis=0) reference = control_values.median() scale_factors = reference / control_values normalized = counts_df.copy() normalized[guide_cols] = counts_df[guide_cols] * scale_factors return normalized, scale_factors nontargeting = counts_df[counts_df['gene'].str.startswith('NonTargeting')]['gene'].unique() normalized, factors = normalize_to_controls(counts_df, nontargeting)
Goal: Remove batch effects using empirical Bayes adjustment while preserving biological signal.
Approach: Log-transform counts, apply pyCombat with a batch vector, and back-transform to count space.
pythondef combat_correction(counts_df, batch_vector, guide_cols=None): '''ComBat batch correction for count data.''' from combat.pycombat import pycombat if guide_cols is None: guide_cols = [c for c in counts_df.columns if c.startswith('sample_')] data = counts_df[guide_cols].values.T log_data = np.log2(data + 1) corrected = pycombat(log_data, batch_vector) corrected_counts = np.power(2, corrected) - 1 corrected_counts = np.maximum(corrected_counts, 0) result = counts_df.copy() result[guide_cols] = corrected_counts.T return result batches = [1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2] corrected = combat_correction(counts_df, batches)
pythondef batch_aware_lfc(counts_df, treatment_cols, control_cols, batch_vector): '''Calculate LFC accounting for batch structure.''' batches = np.unique(batch_vector) lfc_by_batch = [] for batch in batches: batch_treat = [c for c, b in zip(treatment_cols, batch_vector) if b == batch and c in treatment_cols] batch_ctrl = [c for c, b in zip(control_cols, batch_vector) if b == batch and c in control_cols] if len(batch_treat) == 0 or len(batch_ctrl) == 0: continue treat_mean = counts_df[batch_treat].mean(axis=1) ctrl_mean = counts_df[batch_ctrl].mean(axis=1) batch_lfc = np.log2((treat_mean + 1) / (ctrl_mean + 1)) lfc_by_batch.append(batch_lfc) combined_lfc = pd.concat(lfc_by_batch, axis=1).mean(axis=1) lfc_var = pd.concat(lfc_by_batch, axis=1).var(axis=1) return combined_lfc, lfc_var
pythondef check_replicate_correlation(counts_df, sample_cols, replicate_groups): '''Check correlation between replicates.''' correlations = [] for group, replicates in replicate_groups.items(): if len(replicates) < 2: continue for i in range(len(replicates)): for j in range(i+1, len(replicates)): r1, r2 = replicates[i], replicates[j] if r1 in sample_cols and r2 in sample_cols: log_r1 = np.log2(counts_df[r1] + 1) log_r2 = np.log2(counts_df[r2] + 1) corr, pval = stats.pearsonr(log_r1, log_r2) correlations.append({ 'group': group, 'rep1': r1, 'rep2': r2, 'pearson_r': corr, 'pvalue': pval }) return pd.DataFrame(correlations) replicate_groups = { 'treatment_batch1': ['sample_1', 'sample_2'], 'treatment_batch2': ['sample_4', 'sample_5'], 'control_batch1': ['sample_3'], 'control_batch2': ['sample_6'] } corr_df = check_replicate_correlation(counts_df, counts_df.columns[3:], replicate_groups) print(corr_df)
Goal: Quantify batch effect magnitude to determine whether correction is needed.
Approach: Run PCA on log-transformed counts, compute between-batch vs within-batch variance ratio, and assess whether batch structure dominates the first principal components.
pythondef batch_qc_metrics(counts_df, batch_vector, sample_cols): '''Calculate batch-related QC metrics.''' from sklearn.decomposition import PCA from scipy.spatial.distance import pdist log_counts = np.log2(counts_df[sample_cols].values.T + 1) pca = PCA(n_components=min(5, len(sample_cols))) pcs = pca.fit_transform(log_counts) batch_labels = np.array(batch_vector) unique_batches = np.unique(batch_labels) if len(unique_batches) > 1: batch_means = [pcs[batch_labels == b].mean(axis=0) for b in unique_batches] batch_separation = np.mean(pdist(batch_means)) within_batch_var = np.mean([pcs[batch_labels == b].var() for b in unique_batches]) between_batch_var = np.var(batch_means, axis=0).sum() batch_effect_ratio = between_batch_var / (within_batch_var + 1e-10) else: batch_separation = 0 batch_effect_ratio = 0 return { 'batch_separation': batch_separation, 'batch_effect_ratio': batch_effect_ratio, 'pca_variance_explained': pca.explained_variance_ratio_, 'n_batches': len(unique_batches) } qc = batch_qc_metrics(counts_df, [1,1,1,2,2,2], sample_cols) print(f"Batch effect ratio: {qc['batch_effect_ratio']:.2f}")
pythonimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt def plot_batch_effect(counts_df, batch_vector, sample_cols, output_file): '''Visualize batch effects with PCA.''' from sklearn.decomposition import PCA log_counts = np.log2(counts_df[sample_cols].values.T + 1) pca = PCA(n_components=2) pcs = pca.fit_transform(log_counts) fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 6)) for batch in np.unique(batch_vector): mask = np.array(batch_vector) == batch ax.scatter(pcs[mask, 0], pcs[mask, 1], label=f'Batch {batch}', s=100) ax.set_xlabel(f'PC1 ({pca.explained_variance_ratio_[0]:.1%})') ax.set_ylabel(f'PC2 ({pca.explained_variance_ratio_[1]:.1%})') ax.legend() ax.set_title('PCA - Batch Effects') plt.tight_layout() plt.savefig(output_file, dpi=150) plt.close() plot_batch_effect(counts_df, [1,1,1,2,2,2], sample_cols, 'batch_pca.png')
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.