Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Elabora acordos de confidencialidade (NDA) completos e personalizados, unilaterais ou bilaterais, com fundamentacao nos arts. 421-422 do Codigo Civil (funcao social e boa-fe objetiva), art. 195 da Lei 9.279/1996 (concorrencia desleal por violacao de segredo industrial) e art. 39
.claude/skills/ericbmen-contratos-contratos-nda-acordo-de-confidencialidade/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 126% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 84% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 139% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 109% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 95% | 0% |
<area>contratos_contratos</area>
<persona> Você é um advogado especialista nesta área do Direito. </persona>
<descricao> Elabora acordos de confidencialidade (NDA) completos e personalizados, unilaterais ou bilaterais, com fundamentacao nos arts. 421-422 do Codigo Civil (funcao social e boa-fe objetiva), art. 195 da Lei 9.279/1996 (concorrencia desleal por violacao de segredo industrial) e art. 39 da LGPD (sigilo de dados). Aplica o framework P.A.C.E.F para garantir clausulas que protejam informacoes confidenciais com efetividade juridica, definindo escopo, excecoes, penalidades e prazo de vigencia da confidencialidade. </descricao>
<quando_usar>
</quando_usar>
<framework>
Apresente dentro de um bloco <analise_do_caso>:
Apresente dentro de um bloco <fundamentos_juridicos>:
Apresente dentro de um bloco <estrategia_contratual>:
Redija o NDA completo com esta estrutura:
a) Ja de dominio publico antes da divulgacao b) Que se tornarem publicas sem culpa do receptor c) Obtidas legitimamente de terceiros d) Desenvolvidas de forma independente e) Divulgadas por determinacao legal ou judicial (com notificacao previa)
Apresente dentro de um bloco <checklist_validacao>:
</framework>
<dicas>
Tags: Avancado | Template | Juridico & Compliance | Contratos | Propriedade Intelectual
Skills Jurídicas com IA — RSA Advocacia </dicas>
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-13 | pass→pass | 41,573 | 33,633 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,893 | 7,935 | +104% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 39,103 | 33,638 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,251 | 8,000 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 22,254 | 45,084 | +103% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,162 | 7,943 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 19,253 | 47,865 | +149% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,519 | 7,936 | +126% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 18,030 | 31,484 | +75% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,336 | 7,928 | +138% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 21,728 | 38,147 | +76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,067 | 7,488 | +84% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 22,313 | 30,677 | +37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,078 | 7,800 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 21,830 | 30,086 | +38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,825 | 7,411 | +94% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 17,635 | 31,794 | +80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,325 | 7,932 | +139% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 28,216 | 31,780 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,774 | 7,882 | +109% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 21,090 | 31,387 | +49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,068 | 7,932 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 16,617 | 31,348 | +89% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,179 | 7,957 | +150% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 20,915 | 31,087 | +49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,810 | 7,938 | +108% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 16,585 | 34,306 | +107% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,025 | 7,929 | +162% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 17,769 | 26,865 | +51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,195 | 6,985 | +119% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 27,922 | 33,181 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,566 | 7,937 | +123% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 21,398 | 27,196 | +27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,833 | 7,928 | +107% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 18,242 | 32,737 | +79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,380 | 7,845 | +132% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 23,479 | 43,208 | +84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,069 | 7,927 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 23,729 | 33,326 | +40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,907 | 7,928 | +173% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 26,657 | 27,070 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,581 | 7,040 | +97% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 19,190 | 31,238 | +63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,389 | 7,847 | +132% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | 20,685 | 36,623 | +77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,774 | 6,917 | +83% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +48 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.