Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Diagnose SaaS business health across growth, retention, efficiency, and capital. Use when preparing a business review or prioritizing urgent fixes.
.claude/skills/getcrew44-business-health-diagnostic/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 634% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 316% | 0% |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 380% | 0% |
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 578% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 254% | 0% |
Diagnose overall SaaS business health by analyzing growth, retention, unit economics, and capital efficiency metrics together. Use this to identify problems early, prioritize actions by urgency, and deliver a comprehensive health scorecard for board meetings, quarterly reviews, or fundraising preparation.
This is not a single-metric check—it's a holistic diagnostic that connects revenue, retention, economics, and efficiency to reveal systemic issues and opportunities.
A SaaS business is healthy when four dimensions work together:
Early Stage (Pre-$10M ARR):
Growth Stage ($10M-$50M ARR):
Scale Stage ($50M+ ARR):
Critical (Fix immediately):
High Priority (Fix within quarter):
Medium Priority (Address within 6 months):
Use this when:
Don't use this when:
Use workshop-facilitation as the default interaction protocol for this skill.
It defines:
Other (specify) when useful)This file defines the domain-specific assessment content. If there is a conflict, follow this file's domain logic.
This interactive skill asks up to 4 adaptive questions, then delivers a comprehensive diagnostic with prioritized recommendations.
Agent asks:
"Let's diagnose your business health. I'll need metrics across four dimensions: growth, retention, unit economics, and capital efficiency.
Company context:
Why this matters: Benchmarks vary by stage. Early-stage optimizes for growth; scale-stage optimizes for efficiency.
Please provide the following metrics. Use 'unknown' if you don't have a metric."
Agent asks:
"Growth & Retention:
Based on answers, agent evaluates:
Agent asks:
"Unit Economics:
Based on answers, agent evaluates:
Agent asks:
"Capital Efficiency:
Based on answers, agent evaluates:
Agent synthesizes all metrics and delivers:
When:
Output:
"## ✅ Overall Health: Healthy
Your business shows strong fundamentals across all dimensions.
| Dimension | Score | Status | |-----------|-------|--------| | Growth & Retention | ✅ Healthy | Growth ___% YoY, NRR ___%, Churn ___% | | Unit Economics | ✅ Healthy | LTV:CAC ___:1, Payback ___ months | | Capital Efficiency | ✅ Healthy | Rule of 40: ___, Runway ___ months | | Overall | ✅ Healthy | Strong position for scaling |
Even healthy businesses can improve. Here are your top opportunities:
1. Opportunity 1]
2. Opportunity 2]
3. Opportunity 3]
Priority 1: Scale what's working
Priority 2: Expand within base
Priority 3: Improve efficiency
Weekly:
Monthly:
Quarterly:
| Metric | Your Performance | Benchmark | Status | |--------|------------------|-----------|--------| | Growth Rate | ___% | >40% (growth) / >25% (scale) | ✅ | | NRR | ___% | >100% | ✅ | | LTV:CAC | ___:1 | >3:1 | ✅ | | Rule of 40 | ___ | >40 | ✅ | | Gross Margin | ___% | >70% | ✅ |
You're performing at or above benchmarks across the board."
When:
Output:
"## ⚠️ Overall Health: Moderate (Fixable Issues)
Your business has good fundamentals but needs attention in specific dimension].
| Dimension | Score | Status | |-----------|-------|--------| | Growth & Retention | ✅ / ⚠️ / 🚨] | Details] | | Unit Economics | ✅ / ⚠️ / 🚨] | Details] | | Capital Efficiency | ✅ / ⚠️ / 🚨] | Details] | | Overall | ⚠️ Moderate | Primary issue area] needs attention |
High Priority 🚨
Medium Priority ⚠️
Primary Issue: e.g., Retention & Expansion]
Symptoms:
Diagnosis: e.g., Customers are churning before they expand. Onboarding is weak, no clear upsell paths.]
Impact:
Immediate (Next 30 days):
1. Fix Primary Issue]
Short-term (Next Quarter):
2. Secondary Action]
3. Tertiary Action]
Target metrics:
Impact:
If you hit these targets, you'll be in 'Healthy' territory.
Must-track metrics:
Leading indicators:
Don't:
When:
Output:
"## 🚨 Overall Health: Concerning (Urgent Action Required)
Your business has multiple critical issues that need immediate attention.
| Dimension | Score | Status | |-----------|-------|--------| | Growth & Retention | 🚨 Concerning | Details] | | Unit Economics | 🚨 Concerning | Details] | | Capital Efficiency | 🚨 Critical | Details] | | Overall | 🚨 Concerning | Multiple urgent issues |
1. Critical Issue 1 - e.g., Runway]
2. Critical Issue 2 - e.g., Unit Economics]
3. Critical Issue 3 - e.g., Cohort Degradation]
Week 1-2: Triage
Immediate actions:
Month 1: Stop the Bleeding
Priority 1: Fix Unit Economics
Priority 2: Improve Retention
Month 2-3: Stabilize
Milestone 1: Positive Unit Economics
Milestone 2: Slowing Churn
Milestone 3: Runway Extended
Metrics:
Position:
Don't:
Do:
When:
Output:
"## 🚨🚨 Overall Health: Critical (Existential Crisis)
Your business is in survival mode. Immediate drastic action required.
Similar structure to Pattern 3, but more urgent tone, shorter timelines, more drastic measures]
Immediate Actions (This Week):
See examples/ folder. Mini examples below:
Metrics:
Diagnosis: Healthy. Scale aggressively.
Metrics:
Diagnosis: Moderate. Fix retention before scaling further.
Metrics:
Diagnosis: Concerning. Urgent action on retention and unit economics required.
Symptom: "Revenue growing 50%!" (ignoring burn, churn, unit economics)
Consequence: Unsustainable growth. Scaling broken model.
Fix: Look at all four dimensions together.
Symptom: "We're not profitable yet, is that bad?" (early-stage company)
Consequence: Misplaced worry. Early-stage should optimize for growth and unit economics, not profitability.
Fix: Use stage-appropriate benchmarks.
Symptom: "Churn is 5%, let's watch it"
Consequence: By the time lagging indicators (churn, NRR) show problems, it's late.
Fix: Track leading indicators (usage, engagement, onboarding completion).
Symptom: "NRR <100% for 3 quarters, but we'll fix it eventually"
Consequence: Problems compound. Becomes crisis.
Fix: Set clear timelines. If metric doesn't improve in X time, escalate.
Symptom: "Let's improve growth, retention, CAC, and efficiency simultaneously"
Consequence: Resources spread thin. Nothing improves.
Fix: Prioritize top 1-3 issues. Fix sequentially.
saas-revenue-growth-metrics — Detailed growth and retention metricssaas-economics-efficiency-metrics — Detailed unit economics and capital efficiencyfinance-metrics-quickref — Fast lookup for all metrics and benchmarksfeature-investment-advisor — Uses health diagnostic to inform feature prioritiesacquisition-channel-advisor — Uses health diagnostic to inform channel prioritiesfinance-based-pricing-advisor — Uses health diagnostic to inform pricing decisionsresearch/finance/Finance_QuickRef.md (Red flags table)research/finance/Finance_For_PMs.Putting_It_Together_Synthesis.mdresearch/finance/Finance for Product Managers.md| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 7,627 | 4,330 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,329 | 6,936 | +422% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 6,340 | 4,184 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 943 | 6,923 | +634% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 12,403 | 5,506 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,010 | 7,107 | +254% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 17,709 | 9,311 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,567 | 7,604 | +196% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 7,896 | 14,049 | +78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,405 | 8,959 | +538% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 30,086 | 21,314 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,045 | 9,528 | +89% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 16,961 | 9,280 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,510 | 7,764 | +209% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 16,805 | 10,690 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,624 | 7,884 | +200% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 14,408 | 6,604 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,192 | 7,258 | +231% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 10,616 | 6,129 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,749 | 7,279 | +316% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 12,284 | 6,282 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,926 | 7,198 | +274% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 10,881 | 5,843 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,694 | 7,117 | +320% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 11,577 | 8,392 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,824 | 7,478 | +310% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 14,096 | 11,590 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,124 | 7,931 | +273% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 10,600 | 5,109 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,781 | 7,096 | +298% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 9,309 | 2,491 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,509 | 6,596 | +337% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 10,188 | 4,277 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,544 | 6,901 | +347% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 8,831 | 3,230 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,322 | 6,679 | +405% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 9,158 | 4,762 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,369 | 6,912 | +405% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 9,169 | 5,091 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,471 | 7,068 | +380% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 5,940 | 1,694 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 953 | 6,464 | +578% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 8,098 | 7,509 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,307 | 7,477 | +472% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.