Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →LangGraph — orchestrate LLM agents as stateful graphs. Multi-agent coordination, persistent state, human-in-the-loop, streaming, checkpointing, and conditional control flow. Build complex agent workflows.
.claude/skills/mkurman-langgraph/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -18% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -5% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | -50% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 58% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | -16% | 0% |
LangGraph builds stateful, multi-step agent workflows as graphs. Supports conditional routing, human-in-the-loop checkpoints, persistent state, streaming, and multi-agent orchestration. The graph-based design enables complex, controllable agent behavior.
bashuv pip install langgraph
pythonfrom typing import TypedDict from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, END class AgentState(TypedDict): messages: list next_step: str def research(state): return {"messages": state["messages"], "next_step": "write"} def write(state): return {"messages": state["messages"], "next_step": "review"} def review(state): return {"messages": state["messages"], "next_step": "__end__"} graph = StateGraph(AgentState) graph.add_node("research", research) graph.add_node("write", write) graph.add_node("review", review) graph.set_entry_point("research") graph.add_edge("research", "write") graph.add_conditional_edges("write", lambda s: s["next_step"]) graph.add_edge("review", END) app = graph.compile() result = app.invoke({"messages": [], "next_step": ""})
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 13,875 | 11,955 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,896 | 2,733 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 9,468 | 7,829 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,881 | 1,950 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 5,945 | 1,666 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,056 | 529 | -50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 2,655 | 2,441 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 458 | 725 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 5,791 | 3,361 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,105 | 928 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 2,644 | 2,666 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 412 | 752 | +83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 6,211 | 3,629 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,151 | 997 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 2,477 | 2,015 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 436 | 596 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 5,704 | 2,342 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,128 | 751 | -33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 10,438 | 7,198 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,001 | 1,765 | -12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 7,801 | 3,147 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,442 | 881 | -39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 2,349 | 1,775 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 355 | 594 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 9,541 | 4,804 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,643 | 1,264 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 9,949 | 4,708 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,875 | 1,161 | -38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 6,001 | 3,121 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,012 | 856 | -15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→fail | 4,073 | 1,431 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 554 | 528 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 2,787 | 2,103 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 450 | 675 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 9,115 | 5,763 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,518 | 1,250 | -18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 2,668 | 1,890 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 381 | 599 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 13,025 | 6,783 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,477 | 1,632 | -34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 7,054 | 3,552 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,336 | 1,053 | -21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 8,930 | 5,993 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,772 | 1,481 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 11,685 | 9,537 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,178 | 2,266 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of 0 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.