▸case-01 Wir möchten die Schiedsgerichtsklausel in unseren allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen für den B2B-Softwarevertrieb im Hinblick auf das deutsche AGB-Recht prüfen lassen. Das Verfahren soll laut Entwurf nach den Regeln der DIS in Berlin ablaufen, der Streitwert liegt gewöhnlich bei ca. 150.000 Euro. Bitte erstellen Sie eine rechtliche Analyse inklusive Risikoampel zur Wirksamkeit, einer überarbeiteten Fassung im Redline-Modus, einem konkreten Ersatzvorschlag für die Formulierung, Hinweise zu unserer Verhandlungsposition sowie einer prägnanten rechtlichen Begründung anhand der maßgeblichen Gesetzesnormen. | fail→fail | 19,330 | 22,391 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,349 | 5,179 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-02 Ein internationaler Händler bietet Verträge auch für deutsche Endkunden (B2C) an und verwendet eine AGB-Klausel, die ein Schiedsverfahren in Basel vorsieht, um zwingendes deutsches Schutzrecht zu umgehen. Prüfen Sie diese Bestimmung bitte eingehend nach deutschem Zivil- und Prozessrecht. Liefern Sie das Ergebnis als strukturierte Auswertung mit einer Ampelbewertung des Risikos, Anpassungsvorschlägen in der Redline-Sicht, einem abgedeckten Ersatztext, Verhandlungsempfehlungen und einer gerichtsverwertbaren Kurzbegründung. | fail→fail | 19,837 | 20,610 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,725 | 5,054 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-03 Für unseren Mandanten (deutsches Maschinenbauunternehmen) prüfen wir die AGB-Schiedsklausel eines Zulieferers, die Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit bei der ICC in Paris vorsieht. Wir möchten wissen, ob die Klausel nach § 307 BGB und § 1031 ZPO standhält. Bitte liefern Sie eine umfassende Ausarbeitung mit Risikoeinstufung, konkreter Redline-Überarbeitung, einer AGB-konformen Formulierung als Alternative, Empfehlungen für die Verhandlungstaktik und einer fundierten rechtlichen Kurzbegründung unter Berücksichtigung der aktuellen Normen. | fail→pass | 25,599 | 31,457 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,367 | 6,542 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-04 An e-commerce business sells goods to consumers in Germany and wants to include an arbitration clause in its standard terms designating a private tribunal in Switzerland. The merchant aims to avoid statutory German consumer litigation. Evaluate the legal validity of this opt-out strategy. | pass→pass | 17,366 | 18,095 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,010 | 4,420 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-05 A German commercial vendor and a foreign buyer agree in standard terms to resolve disputes via DIS arbitration in Berlin, but select foreign substantive law for the sales contract. The foreign buyer asserts that selecting foreign law completely removes the arbitration clause from German AGB control. Analyze this assertion. | pass→pass | 19,182 | 15,314 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,224 | 4,339 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-06 A standard supply agreement between German commercial parties specifies SIAC arbitration in Singapore for small delivery orders valued under 15,000 EUR. The buyer contends that the distant seat and high administrative costs create an unreasonable obstacle. Assess whether this violates § 307 BGB. | pass→pass | 15,919 | 18,662 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,762 | 4,299 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-07 A consumer service contract includes an arbitration clause embedded within paragraph 18 of the printed general terms, accompanied by a single signature at the bottom of the entire contract document. Determine whether this satisfies German formal requirements for consumer arbitration. | pass→pass | 8,760 | 12,891 | +47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,579 | 3,459 | +119% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-08 In a commercial contract dispute, one party argues that European private international law under Rome I Regulation Article 3 governs the validity of an arbitration agreement contained in standard terms. Evaluate whether Rome I regulates arbitration agreements. | pass→pass | 10,540 | 13,052 | +24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,976 | 3,523 | +78% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-09 A European commercial buyer claims that Article 25 of Brussels Ia Regulation (1215/2012) invalidates a pre-formulated arbitration agreement because it deprives state courts of jurisdiction. Assess the relationship between Brussels Ia and arbitration agreements. | pass→pass | 10,632 | 16,887 | +59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,077 | 4,487 | +116% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-10 A commercial buyer receives delivery notes containing fine print that introduces an arbitration clause for the first time, where no prior negotiation or trade custom existed. Evaluate whether the clause forms part of the contract under German law. | pass→pass | 14,208 | 13,677 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,471 | 3,712 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-11 A foreign vendor seeks to enforce an overseas arbitral award in Germany that was rendered under a standard-term arbitration clause that completely denied the German respondent the right to present its case. Assess enforcement defenses under international treaty rules. | pass→pass | 15,782 | 13,765 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,782 | 3,584 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-12 Draft an alternative, legally robust arbitration clause for a B2B commercial agreement that currently uses a flawed standard clause. The client wants a valid DIS arbitration in Berlin while preserving essential procedural rights. | pass→pass | 14,394 | 15,264 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,490 | 3,897 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-13 A German court invalidates a standard-term arbitration clause under § 307 BGB. The seller claims the entire commercial transaction is rendered void as a result. Assess the statutory outcome under German civil law. | pass→pass | 13,505 | 18,170 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,340 | 4,254 | +82% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-14 A clause in standard business terms states: 'The place of performance is Hamburg, and arbitral hearings may take place there.' Determine whether this wording constitutes an enforceable arbitration agreement excluding state court jurisdiction. | pass→pass | 10,174 | 19,535 | +92% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,654 | 4,524 | +174% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-15 A software licensor wants to include an arbitration clause in its standard B2B licensing terms but fears losing access to rapid preliminary injunctions in German courts against copyright infringement. Analyze whether an arbitration clause blocks interim court orders. | pass→pass | 16,288 | 13,162 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,493 | 3,563 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-16 A commercial lessee under a contract worth 10,000 EUR is subjected to a standard-term clause requiring a 3-arbitrator panel with mandatory advance fee deposits exceeding 25,000 EUR. Evaluate this clause under German AGB control. | pass→pass | 16,602 | 19,271 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,945 | 4,554 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-17 A commercial supplier includes an arbitration clause on the back of its invoice sent weeks after contract execution and delivery. Assess whether the arbitration clause was validly incorporated into the contract. | fail→pass | 12,948 | 16,134 | +25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,180 | 3,752 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-18 A Swiss seller provides machinery to a German buyer using standard terms selecting Swiss substantive law and Zurich arbitration. The seller claims German AGB controls (§§ 305-310 BGB) can never apply. Evaluate this conflict-of-law claim. | pass→pass | 18,756 | 25,377 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,381 | 5,643 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-19 Construct an evidentiary framework to evaluate whether a disputed arbitration clause in a commercial contract represents standard industry practice or an unnegotiated unilateral imposition. | pass→pass | 19,670 | 21,328 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,312 | 4,982 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-20 Our client needs an exclusive state court choice-of-forum clause (Gerichtsstandsvereinbarung) under § 38 ZPO for a B2B sales contract, designating Frankfurt am Main without any arbitration involved. Draft the clause and state the statutory prerequisites under German civil procedure. | pass→pass | 13,613 | 15,854 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,406 | 3,842 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-21 An arbitral tribunal in Munich issued a final award against our client. We believe the tribunal exceeded its substantive mandate. Advise on the procedural grounds, deadlines, and competent court for filing an application to set aside the award (Aufhebungsantrag) under § 1059 ZPO. | pass→pass | 15,081 | 15,677 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,915 | 4,040 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-22 Please review our standard B2B supply terms regarding liability limitations under § 309 Nr. 7 BGB and § 307 BGB for personal injury and gross negligence, assessing whether a liability cap of 50,000 EUR is enforceable. | pass→pass | 17,308 | 19,611 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,315 | 4,706 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |