Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lawve-ai/ai-act-knowledge
EU AI Act Knowledge Engine — authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents (including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification — general principles, Annex I, Annex III). Answers any question about the AI Act with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, incident templates, and sector-specific guidance. This skill should be used w
Passed 19 of 21 test cases with the skill, and 11 of 21 without it.
and 7 more in the full report
8 fixed12 passed either way2 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Ich brauche eine Zusammenfassung der Anforderungen an Risikomanagementsysteme für KI-Systeme mit hohem Risiko nach der EU-KI-Verordnung. Bitte auf Deutsch antworten und den deutschen Artikelnamen bei der ersten Nennung angeben.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Include the German article title 'Art. 9 (Risikomanagementsystem)' on first citation of Article 9. | Missed | Passed |
| Cite Article 9 as the legal basis for risk management system requirements. | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Authoritative knowledge base for Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. Grounded in 70 structured reference files across 15 subdirectories (including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 classification under references/commission-guidelines/ — general principles, Annex I, Annex III), sourced exclusively from official EU institutions (European Commission, EDPB, EDPS, ENISA, EBA, Europol, AI Office, EUR-Lex). Every answer must cite specific articles, paragraphs, recitals, or guideline sections.
Important: This skill provides structured AI Act regulatory information based on the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and official EU institutional sources. It is not legal advice. Specific compliance decisions should involve qualified legal counsel with AI Act expertise.
The reference files cover official sources through March 2026. Search the web when the user asks about events after that date, enforcement actions, national implementation updates, or non-official analysis (law firm perspectives, think tank papers). For niche topics, useful queries include: CEN CENELEC JTC 21 harmonised standards [year], EU AI Act Digital Omnibus trilogue [year], [Member State] AI Act supervisory authority [year].
| Question Type | Signal Words | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Article lookup | "What does Art. X say" | Direct file read → cite verbatim |
| Concept explanation | "What is...", "explain...", "define..." | Find definition + context + recitals |
| Obligation mapping | "What must a [role] do" | Route by role + risk tier |
| Classification help | "Is this high-risk?", "Is this an AI system?" | Read core/decision-trees.md, walk through relevant tree |
| Cross-framework | "AI Act and GDPR", "medical devices + AI" | Multi-file synthesis across domains |
| Timeline / deadlines | "When does X apply?" | governance/implementation-timeline.md |
| Penalty / enforcement | "What are the fines?" | core/regulation-title-VI-X-governance.md (Art. 99) |
| National implementation | Country-specific | national/ files + web search for updates |
| Incident reporting | "Serious incident", "what to report" | templates/ files |
| Sector-specific | Healthcare, banking, HR, law enforcement | sector-specific/ or law-enforcement/ files |
Use the Topic Router below to find the right files. For most questions, read 2–3 files: the primary source, the regulation article text, and any interpreting guideline or opinion.
Each references/ subdirectory contains a README.md listing its files. For topics not in the Topic Router, use Glob to search the references/ directory by keyword.
Always check recitals (core/regulation-preamble-recitals.md) for interpretive context on ambiguous provisions.
test cases passed, vs 11 / 21 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.