Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Unified team skill for UX improvement. Systematically discovers and fixes UI/UX interaction issues including unresponsive buttons, missing feedback, and state refresh problems. Uses team-worker agent architecture with roles/ for domain logic. Coordinator orchestrates pipeline, workers are team-worker agents. Triggers on "team ux improve".
.claude/skills/team-ux-improve/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Systematic UX improvement pipeline: scan -> diagnose -> design -> implement -> test. Built on team-worker agent architecture — all worker roles share a single agent definition with role-specific Phase 2-4 loaded from roles/<role>/role.md.
Skill(skill="team-ux-improve", args="<project-path> [--framework react|vue]")
|
SKILL.md (this file) = Router
|
+--------------+--------------+
| |
no --role flag --role <name>
| |
Coordinator Worker
roles/coordinator/role.md roles/<name>/role.md
|
+-- analyze → dispatch → spawn workers → STOP
|
+-------+-------+-------+-------+
v v v v v
[team-worker agents, each loads roles/<role>/role.md]
scanner diagnoser designer implementer tester| Role | Path | Prefix | Inner Loop | |------|------|--------|------------| | coordinator | roles/coordinator/role.md | — | — | | scanner | roles/scanner/role.md | SCAN- | false | | diagnoser | [roles/diagnoser/role.md](roles/diagnoser/role.md) | DIAG- | false | | designer | roles/designer/role.md | DESIGN- | false | | implementer | [roles/implementer/role.md](roles/implementer/role.md) | IMPL- | true | | tester | roles/tester/role.md | TEST- | false |
Coordinator-only: Utility members can only be spawned by Coordinator. Workers CANNOT call Agent() to spawn utility members.
| Utility Member | Path | Callable By | Purpose | |----------------|------|-------------|---------| | explorer | roles/explorer/role.md | Coordinator only | Explore codebase for UI component patterns and framework-specific patterns |
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
--role <name> → Read roles/<name>/role.md, execute Phase 2-4--role → @roles/coordinator/role.md, execute entry routerux-improve.workflow/.team/ux-improve-<timestamp>/ccw cli --mode analysis (read-only), ccw cli --mode write (modifications)mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg(session_id=<session-id>, ...)Coordinator spawns workers using this template:
Agent({
subagent_type: "team-worker",
description: "Spawn <role> worker for <task-id>",
team_name: "ux-improve",
name: "<role>",
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: ux-improve
requirement: <task-description>
inner_loop: <true|false>
## Progress Milestones
session_id: <session-id>
Report progress via team_msg at natural phase boundaries (context loaded -> core work done -> verification).
Report blockers immediately via team_msg type="blocker".
Report completion via team_msg type="task_complete" after final SendMessage.
Read role_spec file (@<skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.
Execute built-in Phase 1 (task discovery) -> role Phase 2-4 -> built-in Phase 5 (report).`
})| Command | Action | |---------|--------| | check / status | View execution status graph | | resume / continue | Advance to next step |
.workflow/.team/ux-improve-<timestamp>/
├── .msg/
│ ├── messages.jsonl # Team message bus
│ └── meta.json # Pipeline config + role state snapshot
├── artifacts/ # Role deliverables
│ ├── scan-report.md # Scanner output
│ ├── diagnosis.md # Diagnoser output
│ ├── design-guide.md # Designer output
│ ├── fixes/ # Implementer output
│ └── test-report.md # Tester output
├── explorations/ # Explorer cache
│ └── cache-index.json
└── wisdom/ # Session knowledge base
├── contributions/ # Worker contributions (write-only for workers)
├── principles/
├── patterns/
└── anti-patterns/| Scenario | Resolution | |----------|------------| | Unknown command | Error with available command list | | Role not found | Error with role registry | | Project path invalid | Re-prompt user for valid path | | Framework detection fails | AskUserQuestion for framework selection | | Session corruption | Attempt recovery, fallback to manual | | Fast-advance conflict | Coordinator reconciles on next callback | | No UI issues found | Complete with empty fix list, generate clean bill report | | Test iterations exceeded | Accept current state, continue to completion |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 17 counted toward the lift figure. The other 5 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 17 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.