▸case-12 A supplier inserts the following into its B2B general terms: 'Die Haftung für grobe Fahrlässigkeit einfacher Erfüllungsgehilfen wird vollumfänglich ausgeschlossen.' Evaluate whether gross negligence liability can be validly excluded for performance agents in B2B terms. | fail→pass | 15,199 | 18,454 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,766 | 3,925 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-18 What factual matrix elements should a legal advisor collect regarding contract environment, user group, and market standards before determining whether a liability cap in B2B terms is reasonable under § 307 BGB? | pass→pass | 14,966 | 15,973 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,656 | 3,304 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-01 Wir haben folgende Haftungsbegrenzungsklausel in unseren B2B-AGB für Software-as-a-Service vorliegen: 'Die Haftung für leicht fahrlässige Verletzungen wesentlicher Vertragspflichten ist auf den typischerweise vorhersehbaren Schaden begrenzt, maximal jedoch auf 5.000 EUR pro Vertragsjahr.' Bitte überprüfen Sie die Wirksamkeit dieser Regelung rechtlich. Ich benötige eine Risikobewertung mit Ampelsystem, eine korrigierte Textfassung inklusive einer verhandlungsfähigen Ausweichklausel, eine Einschätzung unserer Verhandlungsposition sowie eine prägnante rechtliche Begründung unter Berücksichtigung der maßgeblichen BGB-Vorschriften. | fail→pass | 17,487 | 16,176 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,127 | 3,845 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-02 In a custom B2B software agreement individually negotiated term-by-term between two chief executives without boilerplate terms, the client demands unlimited liability for all negligence. How do standard terms rules (§§ 305-310 BGB) apply to this negotiated term? | pass→pass | 11,321 | 17,599 | +55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,968 | 3,529 | +79% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-03 A buyer purchases industrial machinery under German statutory sales law without any agreed general terms and conditions (AGB). Upon delivery, the machine shows a material defect. What statutory remedies are available to the buyer under § 437 BGB? | pass→pass | 13,587 | 12,575 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,701 | 3,030 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-04 An employer asks for the statutory notice period under German employment law (§ 622 BGB) to dismiss an employee who has been with the firm for 5 years, where no standard terms or collective bargaining agreements apply. | pass→pass | 6,094 | 11,211 | +84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,175 | 2,782 | +137% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-05 Review this clause in consumer general terms for e-commerce: 'Die Haftung des Verkäufers für Schäden an Körper und Gesundheit ist bei leichter Fahrlässigkeit ausgeschlossen.' Provide a legal analysis under German civil law and draft a compliant replacement. | pass→pass | 15,249 | 15,744 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,969 | 3,422 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-06 A cloud hosting vendor's B2B contract limits liability for breach of essential contractual duties (Kardinalpflichten) to 100 Euros per incident regardless of annual fee size. Analyze the clause under § 307 BGB and supply a redline fix. | pass→pass | 17,710 | 17,828 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,264 | 3,758 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-07 An ambiguous liability clause in standard logistics terms can be read either as capping total damages or as completely excluding light negligence liability for core delivery obligations. How must a court interpret this clause during an AGB control test under German law? | pass→pass | 11,803 | 13,424 | +14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,256 | 3,001 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-08 If an AGB liability clause capping breach of cardinal duties in a B2B maintenance contract is held invalid under § 307 BGB, can a judge scale down the excessive cap to a legal amount? Explain the statutory legal consequence. | pass→pass | 12,288 | 12,063 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,208 | 2,681 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-09 A SaaS contract places an exclusion of liability for intentional breach hidden deep within an annex titled 'Technical Server Maintenance Procedures'. Assess the validity of this incorporation under German AGB rules. | pass→pass | 14,393 | 16,328 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,571 | 3,418 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-10 A clause in standard terms states: 'Die Haftung richtet sich nach den billigen Ermessen des AGB-Verwoenders im Rahmens des Angemessenen.' Evaluate this sentence under the German civil code transparency rule. | pass→pass | 13,063 | 17,560 | +34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,230 | 3,641 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-11 A consumer protection association warns a digital platform that its standard terms contain invalid liability waivers. What statutory risk and legal basis govern potential legal action by qualified entities against these invalid standard terms? | fail→pass | 15,057 | 14,352 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,729 | 3,182 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-13 List the fundamental statutory provisions of the German Civil Code (BGB) that govern the judicial control of general terms and conditions from incorporation to invalidity consequences. | pass→pass | 16,430 | 15,322 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,012 | 3,348 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-14 Explain why liability for light negligence regarding 'Kardinalpflichten' receives special statutory protection during AGB review under § 307 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 BGB. | pass→pass | 16,400 | 16,595 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,754 | 3,513 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-15 Draft a legally sound liability clause for B2B IT service terms that covers cardinal duties, intentional misconduct, gross negligence, and mandatory statutory liability. | pass→pass | 12,984 | 18,926 | +46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,384 | 4,251 | +78% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-16 When auditing standard liability terms in a commercial contract between two registered business corporations (GmbH to GmbH), do statutory clause prohibitions under §§ 308 and 309 BGB apply directly? | pass→pass | 13,010 | 12,760 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,247 | 2,910 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-17 Review: 'Der AGB-Verwender haftet nicht für leichte Fahrlässigkeit, es sei denn, es liegt ein Schaden an Leben, Körper oder Gesundheit vor.' The context is a B2B industrial machinery lease contract. Provide a risk rating and redline correction. | pass→pass | 11,834 | 14,074 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,187 | 3,376 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-19 In a software procurement contract governed by German AGB law, the provider inserts a clause waiving statutory strict liability (verschuldensunabhängige Haftung) for initial defects under § 536a Abs. 1 Alt. 1 BGB. Assess the clause validity. | pass→pass | 14,997 | 18,928 | +26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,965 | 4,105 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-20 Evaluate a clause capping damages for light negligence breach of cardinal duties to 'the annual contract value paid by customer in the 12 months preceding the damage event' in enterprise B2B SaaS terms. | pass→pass | 14,621 | 20,690 | +42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,785 | 4,223 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-21 Can a supplier exclude liability under the German Product Liability Act (Produkthaftungsgesetz) within its B2B general terms and conditions? | pass→pass | 14,471 | 17,405 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,573 | 3,728 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-22 Provide a quick legal justification and negotiation advice for a buyer who wants to reject a vendor's total liability cap of 1,000 EUR on a 500,000 EUR IT implementation contract. | fail→fail | 10,565 | 10,517 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,757 | 2,652 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |