Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →3-tier competitor analysis (direct, indirect, secondary) for global markets — positioning, SWOT, content benchmark, market gap. Tools: SimilarWeb, Ahrefs, Semrush, Minea (dropshipping). Trigger: 'competitor research', 'competitive analysis', 'what competitors are doing', 'competitor analysis', 'market research'.
.claude/skills/minhnv0807-08-competitor-research-global/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 249% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 148% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 177% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 109% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 184% | 0% |
Ask user up to 4 questions before starting:
| Tool | What it does | Free tier? | |------|--------------|-----------| | SimilarWeb | Website traffic estimation, top sources, competitor comparison | Yes (limited) | | Ahrefs | SEO/backlink analysis, keyword competition | Trial only | | Semrush | SEO, ads research, keyword gap, competitor traffic sources | Yes (limited) | | Meta Ads Library | All competitor ads currently running on Meta — public, free | Yes (free) | | TikTok Creative Center | Top performing ads by industry, region | Yes (free) | | Minea | Dropshipping ad spy — top selling products on FB/TikTok | Trial only | | AdSpy / BigSpy | Ad intelligence across platforms | Paid only |
For each competitor:
facebook.com/ads/libraryFor dropshipping competitor research:
> See skill 29-dropshipping-mastery-global for full dropshipping research workflow.
Categorize competitors into 3 groups — don't just look at direct competitors:
| Tier | Definition | Criteria | Example (Mid-tier Spa) | |------|------------|----------|------------------------| | Direct | Same tier, same offering, same audience | Same price, same service, same area | Spa B same street, similar pricing | | Indirect potential | Different offering but substitutable | Customer might pick them instead | Cosmetic clinic, at-home skincare, home beauty devices | | Secondary | Same offering, different price tier | Competes when budget shifts | Premium spa (customer downgrades), budget spa (upgrades) |
For each competitor, analyze 8 dimensions:
| Element | Content | |---------|---------| | Main message | Slogan, tagline, brand promise] | | Visual style | Color tone, photo style, video quality] | | Price tier | Low / Medium / High / Premium] | | Target audience | Gender, age, income, interests] | | Stated USP | What do they claim is their differentiation?] |
| Strengths | Weaknesses | |-----------|------------| | List 3-5] | List 3-5] |
| Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | Main channel | Facebook / TikTok / Instagram / YouTube / Email] | | Posting frequency | X posts/week] | | Priority format | Short video / Carousel / Long post / Reels] | | Tone of voice | Professional / Friendly / Humorous / Educational] | | Content angle mix | TOFU X% / MOFU X% / BOFU X%] | | Best performing content | Top 3 highest engagement posts/videos] |
| Channel | Yes / No | Followers / Likes | Activity rating | |---------|----------|-------------------|-----------------| | Facebook Page | | | | | TikTok | | | | | Instagram | | | | | YouTube | | | | | LinkedIn | | | | | Website | | | | | Email | | | |
Estimation method (no need for absolute precision):
| Signal | How to read | |--------|-------------| | Sponsored posts/month | Count "Sponsored" labeled posts in Meta Ads Library | | TikTok video ad volume | TikTok Creative Center -> Top Ads -> filter by industry | | Website traffic | SimilarWeb (free tier) or Semrush | | KOL/UGC volume | Count brand-tagged videos on TikTok |
| Estimated metric | Value | |------------------|-------| | Active ads (Meta Ads Library) | X ads] | | Estimated monthly ad spend | $X — based on ad count x avg CPM] | | Has UGC/KOL? | Yes/No — if yes, estimated X people] |
| Element | Overlap level | |---------|---------------| | Geography | High / Medium / Low] | | Age | High / Medium / Low] | | Income | High / Medium / Low] | | Interests | High / Medium / Low] | | Channels used | High / Medium / Low] |
| Product/service | Competitor price | Your price | Difference | |-----------------|------------------|------------|------------| | SKU 1] | | | | | SKU 2] | | | | | SKU 3] | | | |
| Competitor | Threat level | Reason | |------------|--------------|--------| | Name] | High / Medium / Low | 1 short sentence] |
| | Positive | Negative | |---|---|---| | Internal | STRENGTHS — Your strengths competitors don't have or are weaker at | WEAKNESSES — Your weak points competitors exploit | | External | OPPORTUNITIES — Market gaps competitors haven't claimed | THREATS — Competitor trends/moves threatening you |
Strengths | # | Strength | Which competitor weak here? | How to leverage | |---|----------|----------------------------|-----------------| | 1 | | | | | 2 | | | | | 3 | | | |
Weaknesses | # | Weakness | Which competitor strong here? | How to fix | |---|----------|------------------------------|------------| | 1 | | | | | 2 | | | | | 3 | | | |
Opportunities | # | Opportunity | Why competitors haven't done it? | Recommended action | |---|-------------|----------------------------------|--------------------| | 1 | | | | | 2 | | | | | 3 | | | |
Threats | # | Threat | From which competitor? | Defense strategy | |---|--------|------------------------|------------------| | 1 | | | | | 2 | | | | | 3 | | | |
2x2 matrix — pick 2 axes that fit your industry:
HIGH QUALITY
|
|
Comp C | [YOU]
(cheap, | (mid price,
good qual)| good qual)
|
------- LOW -------- HIGH ---- PRICE
|
Comp A | Comp B
(cheap, | (high price,
low qual) | low qual)
|
LOW QUALITY| X-axis (horizontal) | Y-axis (vertical) | Best for | |---------------------|-------------------|----------| | Price | Perceived quality | Spa, F&B, fashion | | Traditional vs Modern | Mainstream vs Niche | Education, tech | | Convenience vs Experience | Mass vs Premium | F&B, retail | | Online vs Offline | Self-serve vs Full service | Service, SaaS |
How to read the map:
| Gap type | Check question | Finding | |----------|---------------|---------| | Product gap | What need are customers solving DIY because no one serves it? | | | Price gap | What price tier has no one claimed? (between budget and premium) | | | Channel gap | What channel are competitors ignoring? (Email? TikTok Shop? SEO?) | | | Content gap | What angle hasn't been done? (behind scenes? educational? data-driven?) | | | Experience gap | What customer journey step is no one doing well? | |
| Gap | Attractiveness (1-5) | Feasibility (1-5) | Priority | |-----|---------------------|-------------------|----------| | Gap 1] | | | High / Medium / Low | | Gap 2] | | | | | Gap 3] | | | |
For each competitor, pick top 5 posts/videos by engagement in last 30 days:
| # | Competitor | Format | Angle | Views/Reach | Engagement | Why effective? | |---|------------|--------|-------|-------------|------------|----------------| | 1 | | | | | | | | 2 | | | | | | | | 3 | | | | | | | | 4 | | | | | | | | 5 | | | | | | |
| Pattern | Description | Apply to you | |---------|-------------|--------------| | Common hook | Hook style competitors use] | Apply / Don't apply — reason] | | Strong format | Video/Carousel/Text most effective?] | | | Posting time | What hour, what day?] | | | Common CTA | What CTA type?] | | | Viral element | Common trait of effective content?] | |
| Lesson | From which competitor | How to apply | |--------|----------------------|--------------| | Effective content format | | Adapt how] | | Strong channel | | Implementation] | | Customer service | | Improvement] | | Pricing strategy | | Adjustment] |
| Don't copy | Reason | Do this instead | |------------|--------|-----------------| | Copy content verbatim | Lose identity, suffer comparison | Take idea, adapt to your brand voice | | Race to the bottom (price) | Unsustainable | Compete on value, not price | | Imitate positioning | Become "cheap copy" | Find unique angle, differentiate | | Follow trends they did | Late, lost effectiveness | Find new trends or new angle on old |
| Moat type | Competitor has? | You have? | Action | |-----------|-----------------|-----------|--------| | Brand recognition — First-recall | | | | | Network effect — More users = more attractive | | | | | Switching cost — Hard for customers to leave | | | | | Data advantage — Big customer data | | | | | Content library — Large content library, strong SEO | | | | | Community — Loyal community | | | | | Distribution — Strong channel network | | | |
| # | Action | Based on finding | Urgency | Timeline | |---|--------|------------------|---------|----------| | 1 | | | High / Medium | Wk 1-2 | | 2 | | | | Wk 2-4 | | 3 | | | | Mo 2 | | 4 | | | | Mo 3 | | 5 | | | | Long-term |
09-customer-insight-global02-campaign-brief-global05-ad-copy-global10-reverse-kpi-global00-marketing-plan-global29-dropshipping-mastery-globalBefore delivering report, check:
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.