▸case-04 Our legal team needs a determination on whether a machinery shipment from Frankfurt to Minsk triggers US EAR de minimis export control thresholds under US Export Administration Regulations. Please analyze foreign-produced direct product rules and de minimis calculations. | pass→pass | 23,651 | 26,716 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,956 | 5,728 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-05 We are importing consumer electronics from Vietnam into Hamburg and need assistance determining the standard import duty rate under the Union Customs Code (UZK) and general TARIC classification procedures. | pass→pass | 17,107 | 26,545 | +55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,773 | 5,001 | +80% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-16 What specific structural elements must be recorded in the formal compliance file when approving or blocking a transaction involving Belarus? | pass→fail | 24,243 | 29,468 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,081 | 5,211 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-22 Can an exporter face legal penalties for sanction circumvention if both the buyer in Minsk and the secondary recipient in Smolensk are absent from EU sanction lists? | pass→pass | 20,881 | 21,358 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,510 | 4,194 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-01 Wir sind ein deutscher Maschinenbauer und planen die Lieferung von Industriepumpen an einen Großhändler in Minsk. Uns liegen Hinweise vor, dass die Ware von dort eventuell nach Russland weitergeliefert werden könnte. Bitte erstellen Sie ein rechtliches Compliance-Gutachten für unseren Vorstand. Der Bericht soll die rechtlichen Risiken bezüglich des Belarus-Sanktionsregimes sowie möglicher Umgehungspfade analysieren, konkrete Normen zitieren, eine Einschätzung zu notwendigen Sofortmaßnahmen wie einem vorübergehenden Lieferstopp enthalten und ein Prüfraster für die finale Freigabe bereitstellen. | fail→fail | 29,380 | 36,175 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,490 | 7,040 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-02 Unsere Bank hat eine Überweisung im fünfstelligen Bereich erhalten, bei der als Auftraggeber ein belarussisches Industrieunternehmen auftritt, das sich in staatlicher Hand befindet. Wir benötigen eine schriftliche Stellungnahme für unsere Anti-Financial-Crime-Abteilung. Bitte prüfen Sie den Vorgang unter Berücksichtigung von Finanzsanktionen, Eigentums- und Kontrollstrukturen sowie dem Zahlungsrouting. Der Output soll als strukturierter Prüfbericht mit konkreten Verordnungsnachweisen, Risikobewertung und praxisnahen Handlungsempfehlungen aufbereitet sein. | fail→fail | 30,039 | 36,831 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,760 | 6,483 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-03 Ein deutsches Systemhaus beabsichtigt, IT-Wartungsdienstleistungen und Unternehmensberatung für ein staatliches Logistikunternehmen in Belarus zu erbringen. Bevor der Vertrag unterzeichnet wird, benötigen wir ein prägnantes Compliance-Memo für die Geschäftsführung. Führen Sie darin aus, welche Dienstleistungsverbote und Unterauftragsrisiken berührt sein könnten, welche gesetzlichen Vorschriften gelten und welche konkreten Dokumentations- und Prüfschritte wir für eine audit-sichere Akte durchführen müssen. | fail→pass | 23,265 | 29,529 | +27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,881 | 5,578 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-06 An exporter in Munich intends to export industrial valves to an energy company in Tehran. Please provide an assessment under Regulation (EU) 267/2012 regarding nuclear sector dual-use restrictions. | pass→pass | 23,228 | 25,600 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,962 | 4,906 | +66% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-07 A compliance officer asks whether intentional violations of EU embargo prohibitions against Belarus are prosecuted solely as administrative fines or under specific criminal penal provisions. Provide the exact statutory basis under German foreign trade law. | pass→pass | 17,220 | 17,536 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,187 | 3,701 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-08 We are shipping spare parts to a private distributor in Minsk who assures us in writing that goods will remain in Belarus. Is it legally sufficient to evaluate this transaction exclusively under Belarus sanction rules? | pass→pass | 20,689 | 21,831 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,580 | 4,371 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-09 Our German consulting firm is hired by an Austrian prime contractor to supply market analysis to a Belarusian state-owned enterprise. Since we have no direct contract with the Minsk entity, are service prohibitions inapplicable to us? | pass→pass | 17,444 | 22,715 | +30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,138 | 4,356 | +104% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-10 During export screening, our team finds that a logistics intermediary in Minsk is owned 51% by an unlisted state agency, though automated screening software returned green. What operational action should be ordered regarding pending shipments? | pass→pass | 19,097 | 18,653 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,173 | 3,882 | +79% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-15 A German company wants to provide free software updates to a listed Belarusian individual's company. Is this permissible since no money changes hands? | fail→pass | 19,954 | 25,284 | +27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,199 | 4,168 | +90% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-11 A German exporter received an administrative decision with a strict 14-day appeal window regarding a revoked export permission for Minsk. How should the legal compliance memorandum structure its initial analysis? | pass→pass | 27,492 | 28,044 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,020 | 4,768 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-12 A private company in Minsk places an order for dual-use components. The direct buyer is not listed on EU sanction databases, but ownership structure is opaque. What specific factual check must be completed before export authorization? | pass→pass | 17,107 | 23,579 | +38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,009 | 4,243 | +111% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-13 Which specific EU regulation expanded the product restrictions and legal framework for Belarus alongside base Regulation (EU) 765/2006? | fail→fail | 17,448 | 15,840 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,060 | 3,278 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-14 In drafting an internal compliance audit for exports to Brest, is it legally adequate to cite only general regulation numbers like 'VO 765/2006' in our risk matrix? | pass→pass | 19,425 | 25,106 | +29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,560 | 4,164 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-17 An agency wants to offer public relations services to a Belarusian state-owned enterprise. Does EU sanction law restrict non-technical services like PR or management consulting? | pass→pass | 18,910 | 21,423 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,224 | 4,054 | +82% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-18 If a Belarusian business partner is not listed on the EU consolidated list of sanctioned persons, does that guarantee zero sanction risk under EU law? | pass→pass | 19,224 | 20,710 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,280 | 3,827 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-19 When validating foreign trade statutes like AWG or EU sanction ordinances for a formal legal memo, what rule applies regarding source verification? | pass→pass | 20,843 | 12,923 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,535 | 3,484 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-20 Our legal team is sending a Belarus sanctions memo to non-lawyer logistics staff. How must legal terms be presented? | pass→pass | 17,892 | 26,679 | +49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,940 | 4,983 | +157% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-21 Why must an export control assessment explicitly record the exact lookup date for tariff codes and sanction list databases? | pass→pass | 18,092 | 19,295 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,059 | 3,636 | +77% | 0 | 0 | — |